Skip to content

How to think about ‘Schrödinger’s Straits1’ (open and closed at the same time)

As global investors, we are constantly assessing and monitoring the relative attractiveness of countries as investment destinations. We are used to dealing with unexpected events, and are relatively good at quantifying the impacts, when these occur. In this situation, we are trapped in no-man’s land, with clarity on the importance of the Persian Gulf as a meaningful supplier to the world economy, but no visibility on the timing of the potential resolution of the Iran war. Consequently, shipping companies have no confidence in regional freedom of navigation, and the world economy is prejudiced as a result.

In this paper, we consider the conundrum in terms of Schrödinger’s thought experiment by focusing on two elements: energy (oil, liquefied natural gas [LNG], petrochemicals and fertilisers), and geoeconomics.

Regardless of the duration of the conflict around the Strait of Hormuz, the long-term impact will likely be measured in a radical prioritisation of security, resilience and a recalibration of supply chains worldwide. Along with an effort to accelerate non-fossil fuel power generation among the ‘electrostates’ and a review of existing oil and gas resource portfolios in the petrostates, this war will trigger a massive reallocation of capital. We will probably see a lot of bad decisions and hopefully a number of good ones, which will create great investment opportunities.